Merging CulturesMerging Cultures, presented by Anne Litwin Ph.D.
Have you ever worked for a company that underwent a merger? or a company that was acquired by another company? Or were you part of a department that joined with another department? How did the merger/merging go?? Whether you are dealing with the merger of organizations, the joining of departments within an organization or the entry of increasingly diverse populations into the workplace, the process is invariably unsettling for all.
In Part 1 of this workshop we did a simulation in which we explored the dynamics that typically happen when culturally diverse people enter an existing system. In Part 2 we looked at a framework for creating constructive outcomes of merging cultures.
We described the values, decision making style and taboos of 4 typical work cultures:- the Order Culture
- the Spirit Culture
- the Relational Culture
- the Rational/Technical Culture.
Here's what the 4 groups came up with:
ORDER CULTURE
Strengths - Focus on Task (accomplishment) - Clarity (expectations, process, accountability etc.) - Consistent treatment of people - Evidence-based leads to 'real' results/improvements - Having a structure/framework (with some flexibility) frees people to focus on the work and not spending valuable time constantly figuring out or inventing the process - The structure can include hierarchy, teams, or whatever is best for the organization
How Decisions are Made - Organized way - Clear authority and accountability - Input can come in variety of ways - Implementation plans/timetables
Taboos - People who don't operate within the framework Motto (we didn't get entirely comfortable with this - needing more time) - "Security of structure" or - "Getting things done"
Values - Boundaries - Dependability - The Strengths listed above
Relational Cultures
STRENGTHS Interpersonal skills We don’t offend anyone Not a lot of unnecessary barriers to getting work done Empowerment More productivity Synergy Strong teams Willingness to share resources Recognize resources
HOW DECISIONS GET MADE Process clear and agreed to Understood by all Not always consensus – can agree or live with a decision Context driven Recognize assets – strength based Lots of voices influence decision making
TABOOS Power plays Me first Lying Too much ego investment Withholding information Dominating Authoritarianism Neglecting relationships Viewing people as cogs Attacking others Confusing the person and the position
MOTTO Working together we can accomplish something better
MOST VALUE The people Diversity of ideas, skills, expertise, perspectives Relationships and relatedness Laughter People before roles Synergy Warmth
Rational/Technical Cultures
Strengths • Best idea wins • Crispness of thought • Challenge people to deepen their thinking • Anyone can contribute great ideas, at any level in the organization: meritocracy • Respect for ideas trumps personal preferences
Decision Making • Ideas win, not personality • Active idea gathering from diverse sources • Transparency • Challenge each other’s ideas, engage in good debate, competition
Motto • Best idea wins
Taboos • Enforced collaboration / inclusion • Drama
Values • Intellectual freedom
|